Thursday, December 09, 2010

"Global Warming" did not work so now it's "Global Climate Change", or is it?...



Turns out it's getting hard to sell the "Global Warming" stick so it has been changed to "Global Climate Change" which is more broad based and will always be true as long as the weather does not go static and never change at all...


The temperature this morning in Cancun dropped to 51F, breaking the record low for the date of 64 set in 2000. It was also the coldest December morning in Cancun history (old record 52F). Gore must have been there at least in spirit. Recall last year, the IPCC Copenhagen meeting was hit with a blizzard and frigid temperatures. The IPCC moved the meeting to Cancun to avoid another embarrassment and feel the global warmth.

More than 1000 dissenting scientists (updates previous 700 scientist report) from around the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. This new 2010 320-page Climate Depot Special Report—updated from 2007’s groundbreaking U.S. Senate Report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism about the so-called global warming “consensus”—features the skeptical voices of over 1000 international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

You don't know about Frank Luntz?

Do some research.

RightsideVA said...

Yes I am aware of Frank Luntz and his work with polling groups...

In fact he has a poll on FoxNews that shows many people believe Global warming, Climate change, or whatever term works best for the debate, is manmade... Good piece and amazing how it appears on FoxNews which many from the "Left" believe is bias and "Denier Headquartersw"...

Can manmade pollutents cause a temp change? I believe probably so but at what rate and what amount. Is the scientific data and conclusions 100% accurate and complete? No...

Look at Prof Mann and his Hockey stick theory which has been questioned many times on how the conclusion was made and UVA & Mann continue to refuse to provide data & emails on how it was made. Did he "Cherry Pick" tree data to support his conclusion?

Did Al Gore and many in the UN declare the debate over change must happen now while the scientific community is still debating?

The number of scientist that question the conclusion is now over 1,000 http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/special_report_more_than_1000_international_scientists_dissent_over_man_mad/

Posted another YouTube video that asks are Supreme Court justices are in the position to declare manmade global warming causing pollutents...

Video also shows that the fight against globalwarming~climate change is a very big business...

RightsideVA said...

“Controlling carbon is kind of a bureaucrat's dream.
If you control carbon, you control life.”
- MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen, UN IPCC lead author and reviewer

“First off, there isn't a consensus among scientists.
Don't let anybody tell you there is.”
- Dr. CharlesWax, past president of the American Association of State Climatologists

“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it
seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don't buy
into anthropogenic global warming.”
- Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg, NOAA.